home | about us | contact | site map | credits | disclaimer | bookmark

Casino Club warning

Casino Club gets pride of place as the well-deserved first listing in my new "Casino Warnings" section.


Casino Club stole over €190,000, or a quarter of a million US dollars, from its players in late 2008. You can read my extensive Casino Club article for the full details, but here is a summary:

In July 2008, a German player won a €167,500 jackpot, after depositing a total of €25,000 of his own money.

Casino Club immediately locked the account in question, claiming he was a "fraudulent player" and "bonus and bot abuser", without supplying any evidence or clarifying exactly what a "bot abuser" was. They also employed Hambach & Hambach, a gambling specialist law firm, to send the player a solicitor's letter in which the possibility of future legal action was mooted, along with said accusations of "bot abuse", claims that the illegal software in question had predictive ability and vague allusions to multiple accounts.

On the basis of this letter, the casino claimed that because there was a "legal procedure" in progress, all funds had to be frozen until the "procedure" was complete.

There was no legal procedure, only a solicitor's letter. Casino Club used a simple solicitor's letter to justify the withholding of a quarter of a million US dollars of player funds.

These funds belong to either the player in question, or the progressive jackpot from which they came. They do not under any circumstances belong to the casino.

The player originally complained to Bryan Bailey of Casinomeister, whose initial response was to immediately ban him and label him a fraudster. The ban was subsequently lifted and the player was invited to comment in a fresh Casino Club discussion.

Casino Club subsequently amended the "legal procedure" to an investigation by the Malta LGA, their licensing body to whom the player also complained, and who would effectively be judge and jury.

The Malta LGA has no legal authority, and absolutely no reputation for fairness - see my LGA article. Legal irrelevance notwithstanding, they will certainly support the casino's decision.

That said, exactly what the LGA is supposed to investigate is not clear - the jackpot win is legitimate, so the casino appears to be attempting to muddy the waters with accusations of previous foulplay, their "bonus and bot abuse". The fact that no action was taken at the time, and that the player was paid in full, makes a mockery of the claim: if the casino had issues with the winnings in question, they would not have paid them.

The player's deposits, totalling €25,000, have not been returned.

--------------------


On a previous occasion, Casino Club attempted to steal a win of €8000, again using the excuse of "bot play" on the basis that the player in question played a session lasting six hours, which the casino considered "inhuman" and therefore indicative of automated software - see my Casino Club steals €8000 article.

The casino eventually paid this win after failing to present any credible evidence.

Casino Club was finally removed from the Casinomeister accredited list in early 2009.

Casino Club uses the flimsiest, most uncorroborated of excuses to withhold substantial sums of money from its unfortunate players. It should be avoided at all costs.




© 2005 - 2009 hundred percent gambling


Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict