The Palace group: vital bonus rules buried deep in the small print

The Palace Group is a long-standing group of Microgaming casinos, comprised of Spin Palace, Cabaret Club, Ruby Fortune, Mummy's Gold and Piggs Casino.

The Palace Group is among the burgeoning list of Casinomeister accredited casinos, a behemoth which includes, amongst others, the following operational standards:

• Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.

• No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.

Does the Palace group adhere to these laudable aims?


All casinos in the group offer a 100% sign up bonus. The terms for the Spin Palace offer are found on the terms & conditions 100% welcome bonus page, and include this little gem:

6. All withdrawals will be subject to audit by the Casino. The Casino reserves the right to reclaim the Welcome Bonus and any winnings and/or close an account in a situation of obvious abuse or fraud.

...which is basically casino-speak for "if you win with a bonus". Aside from that, these terms are fair enough, and don't present any particular problem for the player.


However, these are not the only terms applicable to the welcome bonus.


Go to the bottom of the page and click on the second link from the left, and you'll find the general terms page. It's very long, has some fairly dry titles such as "website terms of use agreement" and "Maltese Law", and doesn't seem to contain anything relevant to bonuses.


Now scroll all the way to the bottom, to the innocuously titles "other" section:


• Barred countries...

• Ineligibility of employees to gamble at the casino...

• List of casino's "reservation of rights"...


Still awake?


• Right to use winners' names for marketing...

• Declaration of limited liability...


A cup of coffee might help...


• Right of contact...

• Right to amend conditions...


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...


However, after fully seventy three clauses of tedious drivel (I counted them all) we arrive at a clause extremely relevant to the signup bonus, and entirely missing from the bonus terms page:

18.9
Before any withdrawals are processed, your play will be reviewed for any irregular playing patterns. In the interests of fair gaming, equal, zero or low margin bets or hedge betting, shall all be considered irregular gaming for bonus play-through requirement purposes.

Other examples of irregular game play include but are not limited to, placing single bets equal to or in excess of 30% or more of the value of the bonus credited to their account until such time as the wagering requirements for that bonus have been met.

Should the Casino deem that irregular game play has occurred, the Casino reserves the right to withhold any withdrawals and/or confiscate all winnings.

This is the "Fortune Lounge clause", so named (by me) as having originated at that particular group - see my Fortune Lounge warning.

In the first place, the casino reserves the right to consider any playing style as fair game for winnings' confiscation ("...including but not limited to...").

In the second place, neither this license to confiscate, nor, in particular, the limit to wagers no greater than 30% of the total balance, is included in the promotion terms and conditions.


As such, the player may abide by the full terms and conditions of the signup bonus, yet still find himself in violation of the rules. And since the minimum deposit that may receive the bonus is $20, then a bet of just $6 would constitute this license to confiscate winnings.

In fact, taking the maximum bonus, you may never bet more than $45 without violating the rules and losing any winnings.

Surely almost all players will, at some point in their play, violate this condition unless they're aware of it?


Yet this extraordinarily restrictive and essential to know rule is not mentioned on the bonus rules page, but buried deep in the small print of the general terms - a place where no player would think to look for bonus rules, there being a whole page dedicated to them elsewhere.

How odd.


Going back to the Casinomeister rules of casino engagement:

• Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.

• No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.

The Palace Group appears in violation of both these requirements.


It's always encouraging to see that where the player is held to the strictest letter of the law, the casino may get away with anything.

But then, they hold the money, and may do as they please.


If and when the US government decides to reconsider the illegalisation of online gambling in their country, I wonder where the Palace Group will be in the entry queue?

Post a Comment

May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | August 2006 | October 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 |